东京爱情故事

室内温度能降低4～6℃ 建筑立面能随着日照角度等变换光影色泽 这款光伏幕墙为城市低碳转型提供了“好看又实用”的杭州方案_我的网站

一 |     NEW DELHI -- India’s top court on Tuesday refused to legalize same-sex marriages, passing the responsibility back to Parliament in a ruling that disappointed campaigners for LGBTQ+ rights in the world's most populous country. Chief Justice DY Chandrachud also urged the government to uphold the rights of the queer community and end discrimination against them. Earlier this year, the five-judge bench heard 21 petitions that sought to legalize same-sex marriage. Chandrachud said there were degrees of agreement and disagreement among the justices “on how far we have to go” on same-sex marriages, but a majority of the judges agreed that the court cannot grant LGBTQ+ people the right to marry as that is a legislative function. “This court can’t make law. It can only interpret it and give effect to it,” the chief justice said, reiterating that it was up to Parliament to decide whether it could expand marriage laws to include queer unions.One of the petitioners, Mario da Penha, said it was “a day to be disappointed but not to lose hope.”“There's been tremendous work that has gone into these petitions, and many hopes and dreams of the queer community attached to them - to lead lives that most other Indians take for granted. The fact that the dream could not come to fruition today is a disappointment for all of us,” he said.He added that it was not yet clear if the court had set a mandate or timeline for Parliament to act. “Without that mandate, there is no pressure on Parliament to enact any legislation.”“There are queer couples today that are already families and in relationships, and are pillars of society. That they are not afforded the dignity and rights that they are due is deeply disappointing,” said Karuna Nundy, one of the lawyers representing the petitioners. Legal rights for LGBTQ+ people in India have been expanding over the past decade, mostly as a result of the Supreme Court’s intervention. In 2018, the top court struck down a colonial-era law that had made gay sex punishable by up to 10 years in prison and expanded constitutional rights for the gay community. The decision was seen as a historic victory for LGBTQ rights, with one judge saying it would “pave the way for a better future."Despite this progress, Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government resisted the legal recognition of same-sex marriage and rejected several petitions in favor. During the hearings, the government argued that a marriage is only between a biological male and a biological woman, adding that same-sex marriages went against religious values and that the petitions reflected only “urban elitist views”. Religious groups too had opposed same-sex unions, saying they went against Indian culture.Adish Aggarwala, the president of the Supreme Court bar association, said the court had done the right thing by recognizing that this was a job for Parliament, an argument the government also made during the hearings. Lawyers for the petitioners argued that marriage is between two people, not just a man and woman. They said concepts of marriage have gradually changed with time and laws should acknowledge that. By not recognizing such unions, the government was depriving same-sex couples of their right to equality enshrined in the constitution and rights enjoyed by married heterosexual couples, from adoption and medical insurance to pensions and inheritance, they argued. “This court needs to push society to acknowledge same-sex marriage,” one of the lawyers said.Petitioners were hopeful that the Supreme Court could challenge the government’s position.But even as some of the justices urged that the state must make sure queer couples don't face harassment or discrimination in accessing basic needs, like opening a joint bank account, they stopped short of granting legal recognition to same-sex unions. Instead, the court accepted the government's offer to set up a special panel that will explore granting social and legal benefits to same-sex couples. Homosexuality has long carried a stigma in India’s traditional society, even though there has been a shift in attitudes toward same-sex couples in recent years. India now has openly gay celebrities and some high-profile Bollywood films have dealt with gay issues. According to a Pew survey, acceptance of homosexuality in India increased by 22 percentage points to 37% between 2013 and 2019.But same-sex couples often face harassment in many Indian communities, whether Hindu, Muslim or Christian.India is estimated to have at least 2.5 million LGBTQ+ people, according to government figures from 2012. However, gay rights activists and global estimates believe they number at least 10% of the population, or more than 135 million.In May, Taiwan became the first jurisdiction in Asia to recognize same-sex marriages. In July, Nepal's Supreme Court issued an interim order enabling the registration of same-sex marriages for the first time. It is still not clear when the court would make its final decision on the case.。    近日，2026年度杭州市十大低碳应用场景评选结果公布，上城区数字能源港低碳园区示范场景、钱塘区焱唐超级工厂动态显色发电建筑立面示范场景等建筑领域的两个案例成功入选。上城区数字能源港位于上城区钱塘智慧城城北园区，占地0.61平方公里，这里曾有都市老旧工业园区的通病——空间紧、负荷密、用能杂，如今，通过全链路系统性低碳改造，它成了都市老工业园区绿色低碳转型的“模范生”。园区改造方案根据办公楼、连续生产厂房、公共空间等不同场景的用能特征“对症下药”。在技术落地上，打造全链路减碳闭环——发电环节，园区规模化应用碲化镉薄膜光伏幕墙、异质结光伏屋顶、叠层钙钛矿光伏等三类技术，并创新采用燚彩工艺实现建筑美学与发电效率的平衡；储能环节，系统部署液冷、浸没式、固态电池三种储能系统；使用环节，落地温湿度独立控制的“五恒系统”，部署“光储直柔”直流办公空间，消除交直流转换损耗5%～8%。

二 | 而更聪明的是园区自主研发的“智慧能源大脑”，这就像一个全能管家，统筹能源、设备、空间、通行、消安、告警、运维等板块，把能源流与数据流深度融合。简单来说，运用专业算法，它可以预判光伏发电量和用电需求，自动生成储能充放电计划和可调负荷调度指令，预测精度达90%以上。结合微气象站预警，它能“冷暖先知”并且启动空调低功率预运行，自动调节园区室内温度。它还能调节充电桩错峰充电，并把光伏产生的绿电直接供给周边建筑使用。再来看看钱塘区焱唐超级工厂创新应用的燚彩光伏幕墙，为城市低碳转型提供了“好看又实用”的杭州方案，简单地说，这是将动态显色发电玻璃融入工业立面，以纳米镀膜技术打破光伏“美观与效率”的固有矛盾，让厂房立面装上光伏成为可能。应用燚彩光伏幕墙后，厂房外墙热渗透率降低了37%，室内温度可降低4～6℃，大幅削减夏季空调负荷用电。同时，燚彩产品特有的智能显色技术，让建筑立面可以随着日照角度、季节天气变换光影色泽，晴日强光下展现富有科技感的金属色泽，阴雨天则呈现温润的哑光质感。项目预计年发电量约32万度，每年的发电收益约23万元，2025年生命期内总减排二氧化碳7962吨，减排二氧化硫240吨，减排氮化物120吨。

Current article:http://qtc.shouyouxumianpouluanteng.shop/news/20260826_406513.html

Published on:00:00:00